I've been following this for a few moments now ,, I can't find any where it says this guy shot at Trump , just that he was seen near the Golf course with the AK and they opened up on him .. I havent seen anything about him shooting or returning fire on the SS yet.
One side isn't talking about eating pets, or doubling down on other bullshit you'd only see in the tabloids in the grocery store check out.Both sides say ridiculous shit, I'm not taking sides.
I would guess that most people here have better options.Many might not like her, won't vote for her, but will still fuck her!
I met her in the mid 80's, called her Kamatoes, pissed her off.I would guess that most people here have better options.
DEI at its best if you ask me.
As far as i've heard , he was spotted by the advance team and they routed him .. at no time was Trump in danger of being shot at and this guy never fired a shot.You would think that after the catastrophic failure of the USSS in Pennsylvania a few weeks ago, they would make the security of both candidates their highest priority. You can't tell me they are hiring and promoting the most qualified people.
DEI at its best if you ask me. I can't imagine how bad things could get if one of them were assassinated.
This is Bush league bullshit mistakes.
Are you saying that only white guys should guard Trump from here on our?
As far as i've heard , he was spotted by the advance team and they routed him .. at no time was Trump in danger of being shot at and this guy never fired a shot.
So no one was hurt , they caught the guy .... seems like they did an ok job this time.
Which law was that?One of the laws Trump repealed to help out his NRA donners would of kept this guy from being able to purchase any firearms. There is even a pic of him holding it up with a giant smile when he signed the new shit in and the existing one out.
This is the one that ive heard mentioned in the media a couple of times.I didn't read anything like that into what he wrote. However, watching the video from the first attempt, I saw two female agents. One could not holster her firearm and was literally obese. The other was messing with her sunglasses.
Now before you jump on me about women, I have no doubt a woman could do the job well. I suspect that very few qualified women applied, and in a quest to reach the former director's goal of having the agents be 30% female, they lowered the standards where women are concerned. That's DEI.
Yes and no. Some agents did a fine job. They also got lucky when a bystander managed to act quickly and get a picture of the getaway vehicle and it's plate.
I watched the press conference this afternoon, presented by the USSS Acting Director, a US Attorney an FBI agent and local law enforcement.
There was a lot of self congratulating. The USSS Acting Director made a big point to list the assets they had deployed, including air assets, counter snipers and others. He said the area was searched by agents using dogs prior to Trump starting his game. They also said they tracked the suspect's cell data and that he had been waiting in that spot for 12 hours.
Sadly, no reporter asked the obvious question, something like "Mr. Director, given you had asserts including man power in the form of USSS agents, dogs, local PD and air support, how was this man able to hide in that spot for 12 hours undetected?"
Further, it is apparent that USSS agents could not pursue the suspect when he fled because he was on the other side of a chain link fence. There were no agents outside that fence. Had it not been for the bystander, the guy would probably made a clean getaway.
Which law was that?
Regardless, "this guy" is a convicted felon. As such, he should not have been sold a firearm, or possessed a firearm. Further, the serial number on the SKS rifle had been obliterated, so it is illegal for anyone to sell, buy or possess that firearm. Today, he was arraigned on charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm and receiving and possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number.
I'm sure more charges will be coming, but these felony charges let law enforcement hold him while they keep investigating. FBI today, at that same presser, said the man had invoked his right to remain silent and requested an attorney.
This is the one that ive heard mentioned in the media a couple of times.
Loading…
www.npr.org
Fucked up thing about some of this is the carry laws in Florida as well right ,, its legal to carry a long gun in public ? .. so until he ducked into the property ,, he could of just been joe schmoe walking to the gun range .... thats more than a bit fucked up.
The GOP-majority Senate passed the bill by a 57-43 margin earlier this month, following a House vote to overturn the rule.
Right on man ! , I know here in Maine there is no concealed permit , most folks dont carry where I live unless they are up to some thing , worried about something or heading up to camp or into the woods , like one guy i know carries a 357 on his hip all day in the woods ,,, rabid bear , pissed off moose , pack of yotes .. its good to at least have something with yaSo I'm pretty active in the firearm rights community, and I'm not familiar with this. I read the article and noted:
I don't recall that the GOP never had a 57 seat advantage in the Senate.
I'll see if I can find more on this; I don't consider NPR an objective news outlet. I'm very interested to know what type of financial mismanagement would cost people their right to possess a firearm. I gather from the article that whatever it was, it was not a crime. We don't generally deprive people of their rights for non-violent non-crimes, nor should we.
In most states its legal to carry a long gun in public. In fact, in a large majority of states it's legal to carry a concealed handgun without a permit.
I would be shocked if USSS or any law enforcement encountered someone carrying a rifle in the vicinity of a protected person, they would just say "oh he's probably just walking to a range." I would bet good money there is no rifle range within walking distance of that golf course.