How are my labs? Am i gonna have a heart attack?

Joined
Aug 19, 2024
Messages
84
Reaction score
109
Points
33
I myself shoot for 1.5 grams/pound of bodyweight from high quality sources. I grow better then on 1 gram/pound. I don't count plant sources.

The literature supports this. 0.8-1.5g/lb is the ideal range for maximized muscle growth. The chart is asymptotic when going above, and hyperbolic when going below that range.

And plant sources have very little bio-availability compared to animal sources. Digestion ease and rates also vary wildly, but animal sources are by far the best option.
 

buck

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
1,236
Points
113
The literature supports this. 0.8-1.5g/lb is the ideal range for maximized muscle growth. The chart is asymptotic when going above, and hyperbolic when going below that range.

And plant sources have very little bio-availability compared to animal sources. Digestion ease and rates also vary wildly, but animal sources are by far the best option.
I tend to find most of the literature is geared towards the population in general. And not to those who are hard training bodybuilders looking for optimal results. I saw old soviet studies that showed 3 grams per pound with their Olympic weightlifting athletes showed they were in negative nitrogen balance. I tried 1 gr/pound and grew. With 1.25 i grew better. On 1.5 grams i grew even better. And just because people are taking something in does not mean it is getting digested and absorbed. That is another topic. And age makes a difference too. There are many factors to what is best it seems. People can try something far several months and find out if it gives them more of an advantage.
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2024
Messages
84
Reaction score
109
Points
33
People can try something far several months and find out if it gives them more of an advantage.
Bingo. The key is to start with a stable test, then adjust as necessary based on results.
 
Top