II didn't feel there was any argument. Just a healthy dose of different opinions. I know anything on the net these days that is not total agreement can be thought of as an argument. But i grew up in a time when people disagreed and then continued being civil with each other or even friends. We have often not seen eye to eye, but that is just how things go. And it seems neither of us like giving up on a topic. I rarely find people in the world that see things as i do all the time and expect that. I rarely pay any attention to people's opinions and expect the same in return. We all have one. I like data.I deleted my post because it sounded as if I was arguing, which I was not.
I don't disagree with you. I was just looking at things from different angles.
Fact is that none of us really know beyond the fact that high levels of GH will effect longevity in geriatric patients. What would be useful would be human studies that outline what it considers a high level of GH. I think that piece would automatically clear up so much and make this more of a black and white discussion.
Yes, more human studies would be great but i don't expect any good ones in my lifetime, but we will see. I tend to like much of what David Sinclair puts out on the topic. But smart people can always make a good case for either side of a topic.