xyokoma
Elite Lady Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2017
- Messages
- 589
- Reaction score
- 813
- Points
- 63
I would argue but it’s not polite to disagree with the elderlyI’m still gangster
I would argue but it’s not polite to disagree with the elderlyI’m still gangster
Not everyone that runs larger amounts than some think necessary or smart does so because they "aren't focusing on maximizing their training/nutrition" . I'm not saying it's smart to run higher doses but I get kinda tired of hearing people saying others do it to cut corners elsewhere. Maybe some do but there are likely just as many running any kind of dose thinking they can cut corners elsewhere.Agree, exactly my point. Anything over the 300 ace/400 e mark is wasted/increased risk/misery. If guys aren't focusing on maximizing their training/nutrition to get the full benefit of any AAS without doing needless large amounts they probably have no business playing with hormones. This is not an original statement either, but have been told the same by some pretty big pros
Not everyone that runs larger amounts than some think necessary or smart does so because they "aren't focusing on maximizing their training/nutrition" . I'm not saying it's smart to run higher doses but I get kinda tired of hearing people saying others do it to cut corners elsewhere. Maybe some do but there are likely just as many running any kind of dose thinking they can cut corners elsewhere.
Back to the subject, I'm nearly 69 and I love Tren but then again I'm not your everyday 69 yr old either.
I don't believe I ever said anything about cutting corners. IMO, and I've heard it from some of the "big boys" (pros) as well, large doses of tren are overkill. Do what you want, your body, your life. more isnt better. I have run tren at 600 and noticed zero difference in effect over 300-400, except for side effects. I stand by my statements.Not everyone that runs larger amounts than some think necessary or smart does so because they "aren't focusing on maximizing their training/nutrition" . I'm not saying it's smart to run higher doses but I get kinda tired of hearing people saying others do it to cut corners elsewhere. Maybe some do but there are likely just as many running any kind of dose thinking they can cut corners elsewhere.
Back to the subject, I'm nearly 69 and I love Tren but then again I'm not your everyday 69 yr old either.
I’m 48, ran it for the first time over the summer(ace)only 10 weeks and dosages from 110-175/week. Not much in the way of sides, maybe slightly elevated BP, but, that could also be blamed on the 525mg prop or excess water I was carrying. Dropped it about 6 weeks ago, just knocked off about 10lbs of water and BP down to 110/70 this morning.
I hope I'm still doing what you're doing at 69.Back to the subject, I'm nearly 69 and I love Tren but then again I'm not your everyday 69 yr old either.
Well the bottom line I guess is that everyone is different. There are those that are gifted genetically and those who are cursed, and everything in between. Some guys just look at a weight and they gain and some struggle for years to put on muscle. Then there are androgen receptors. Some have more, some have less. And then you have poor responders to androgens and you have hyper-responders. I would say your 'big boys/pros' tend to lean more to the gifted side of the spectrum of genetics and possibly also towards the better responders to androgens. In fact to be pro quality you'd almost have to be. So just because someone responds well to a certain dosage and doesn't see better results with more doesn't necessarily mean the next guy responds similarly.I don't believe I ever said anything about cutting corners. IMO, and I've heard it from some of the "big boys" (pros) as well, large doses of tren are overkill. Do what you want, your body, your life. more isnt better. I have run tren at 600 and noticed zero difference in effect over 300-400, except for side effects. I stand by my statements.
208(right) to 240(left), 525 prop,175 tren a and 350 mast a. I’ve been severely limited in training as well due to being 9 months post op after destroying my right shoulder and awaiting surgery on the left. So,, I’d say it was successful, considering.How were the results of that cycle?
208(right) to 240(left), 525 prop,175 tren a and 350 mast a. I’ve been severely limited in training as well due to being 9 months post op after destroying my right shoulder and awaiting surgery on the left. So,, I’d say it was successful, considering.