Will someone help me in DIET question?

[miskolcavengers]

Why is it entirely different feeling, if Í eat 1000 kcal a day, than if Í eat 2000, and burn 1000 by exercises, the latter Í am much less hungary, yet it is mathly the same?

 

[Bro Bundy]

I would die on 1000 cals a day

 

[Bro Bundy]

U got fuel the machine then destroy yourself in the gym

 

[CJ]

Why is it entirely different feeling, if Í eat 1000 kcal a day, than if Í eat 2000, and burn 1000 by exercises, the latter Í am much less hungary, yet it is mathly the same?

Well, your body can sense that you ate more food, so hunger signaling is dampened.

You probably had more nutrition, ie vitamins and minerals, so that could also damper hunger signaling.

Also, if you're using what machines/watches say that you're burning for calories, those are notoriously inaccurate, so your deficit is probably smaller than you think that it is.

Could also just be in your head.

Also.... Don't diet on 1,000 calories, that's just dumb.

 

[miskolcavengers]

U got fuel the machine then destroy yourself in the gym

Well, your body can sense that you ate more food, so hunger signaling is dampened.

You probably had more nutrition, ie vitamins and minerals, so that could also damper hunger signaling.

Also, if you're using what machines/watches say that you're burning for calories, those are notoriously inaccurate, so your deficit is probably smaller than you think that it is.

Could also just be in your head.

Also.... Don't diet on 1,000 calories, that's just dumb.

Í walk in natures 2.5 hrs , 3.2mph counting that as 1000, about right? Í am 240 lbs.

 

[CJ]

Í walk in natures 2.5 hrs , 3.2mph counting that as 1000, about right? Í am 240 lbs.

Maybe, but probably not.

And you'd still have to subtract the calories you would've burned in those 2.5 hours, if you weren't walking. If you would've normally burned 400 calories otherwise, your true deficit is only 600 calories. Yup, it works like that.

 

[Andrewgen_Receptors]

walk in natures 2.5 hrs , 3.2mph counting that as 1000, about right?

probably more like 400 calories tbh. Walking really isn't that intensive.

 

[willyouplease]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

 

[willyouplease]

thank you ver mch guyss

 

[willyouplease]

Maybe, but probably not.

And you'd still have to subtract the calories you would've burned in those 2.5 hours, if you weren't walking. If you would've normally burned 400 calories otherwise, your true deficit is only 600 calories. Yup, it works like that.

Í thought the calvculator will substract that by itself, .... why is it so dumb,? checked with 3 different calculatores and all gave more or less 1000kcal.s...

 

[CJ]

Í thought the calvculator will substract that by itself, .... why is it so dumb,? checked with 3 different calculatores and all gave more or less 1000kcal.s...

The calculators are just guesses. I would NEVER use those numbers to offset the calories that I'm eating.

Remember the first time that you jogged a mile, how hard it was? But it became easier over time, right? Our bodies get efficient with movement, and the better we become at them, the more often that we do them, we'll burn less calories doing the same work.

 

[willyouplease]

The calculators are just guesses. I would NEVER use those numbers to offset the calories that I'm eating.

Remember the first time that you jogged a mile, how hard it was? But it became easier over time, right? Our bodies get efficient with movement, and the better we become at them, the more often that we do them, we'll burn less calories doing the same work.

thank you very much CJ

 

[CJ]

I would die on 1000 cals a day

This should never be done. I hope the OP was just giving an example, and not drawing from experience.

 

[willyouplease]

This should never be done. I hope the OP was just giving an example, and not drawing from experience.

1500 is closer to reality

 

[CJ]

1500 is closer to reality

Unless you're a small woman, this is waaaay too low.

 

[Yano]

A nevet amit megváltoztattál igen?

 

[Test_subject]

Well, your body can sense that you ate more food, so hunger signaling is dampened.

You probably had more nutrition, ie vitamins and minerals, so that could also damper hunger signaling.

Also, if you're using what machines/watches say that you're burning for calories, those are notoriously inaccurate, so your deficit is probably smaller than you think that it is.

Could also just be in your head.

Also.... Don't diet on 1,000 calories, that's just dumb.

This is exactly why I like to tell people to add in more cardio before cutting calories if their progress stalls out when they’re cutting.

 

[willyouplease]

A nevet amit megváltoztattál igen?

this is full nonsense - "the name you changed yes ?"

Unless you're a small woman, this is waaaay too low.

Í am big man 6'0, 240lbs etc.. Í will not be hungry with 1500...

This is exactly why I like to tell people to add in more cardio before cutting calories if their progress stalls out when they’re cutting.

Í cannot add more than this bc its very time consuming

 

[Yano]

Yesterday you called yourself - miskolcavengers

Miskolc is in Hungary so I used your own language.

Now I use mine

Иди на хуй

 

[willyouplease]

Yesterday you called yourself - miskolcavengers

Miskolc is in Hungary so I used your own language.

Now I use mine

Иди на хуй

Sugi pula . This is my actual own language . Í know 6 lan guages... Harasso ...