New Blood Work In

Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
47
Reaction score
19
Points
3
Good afternoon, fellas -
On 2/5 my T was at 964 and E2 was 37. I decided to get labs done a few days ago from my primary, before going to my TRT doc in 2 weeks and here is what they are now:
Total - 1053
Free - 216
E2 - 79

And this was also on pin day, meaning it had been 5 days since last pin.
Im not experiencing any sides (tender nipples, etc). Still working on getting my BF down though, as it’s been a pain in the ass - even with a slight deficit over the past few weeks.

Thoughts on the E2? It’s high, but no noticeable sides…
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
47
Reaction score
19
Points
3
Good afternoon, fellas -
On 2/5 my T was at 964 and E2 was 37. I decided to get labs done a few days ago from my primary, before going to my TRT doc in 2 weeks and here is what they are now:
Total - 1053
Free - 216
E2 - 79

And this was also on pin day, meaning it had been 5 days since last pin.
Im not experiencing any sides (tender nipples, etc). Still working on getting my BF down though, as it’s been a pain in the ass - even with a slight deficit over the past few weeks.

Thoughts on the E2? It’s high, but no noticeable sides…
Also - cholesterol is 161 and normal, but LDL is high at 104. I do not eat foods that contribute to this. These labs are fucking with me.
 

buck

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
974
Points
83
Many long-term studies i have seen show long term negative side effects start for the heart, prostate and liver by the time people are at the top of the normal range. Just depends on your comfort zone as to if you are ok with those E2 levles.

Most all cholesterol is made in the bode and is not from food that is eaten.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
47
Reaction score
19
Points
3
Thanks for the info about cholesterol - overall cholesterol was good so not terribly concerned looking back.
But I just wasn’t anticipating E2 being that high from what I’m running and with my current T levels, and especially not feeling any sides. It would be nice to bring it below 40 with some Aromasin - I’ve just always read that one wants E2 as high as it can go without sides. But I guess that’s until it gets to a certain point. Definitely choose health.
 

Gadawg

The Tick
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
4,584
Reaction score
4,986
Points
193
Many long-term studies i have seen show long term negative side effects start for the heart, prostate and liver by the time people are at the top of the normal range. Just depends on your comfort zone as to if you are ok with those E2 levles.

Most all cholesterol is made in the bode and is not from food that is eaten.
Do those studies cofound for the fact that most regular men with high estrogen are gonna be fat, and thus, metabolically ill?
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
47
Reaction score
19
Points
3
Do those studies cofound for the fact that most regular men with high estrogen are gonna be fat, and thus, metabolically ill?
I was wondering about that as well, as there were very little studies (that I could find) that show the “natural” uninhibited aromatse levels in relation to and in reaction to increased test. The only one I found said that if the T:E was less than 10:1 if I read it correctly. So if I’m at 1053 and E2 at 73, not experiencing any sides (in fact, massive strength gains and increased muscle mass), maybe that could be interpreted as more than the 10:1 ratio and thus, not too problematic?
I’m just asking, as I want to be healthy, but also want to maximize gains.
 

buck

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
974
Points
83
Do those studies cofound for the fact that most regular men with high estrogen are gonna be fat, and thus, metabolically ill?
These studies started decades ago when people were less fat. I go with the best data i have available to me whether i like it or not when making decisions. Do you have any data stating something different?
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
47
Reaction score
19
Points
3
Hey guys I recently got bloodwork and I am a bit curious about my estrogen level.
I am currently on 250mg TE per week. I do 125mg Mon and 125mg Thu.

Testosterone >1500 ng/dL
Estradiol 65.1 pg/mL

The lab says normal estradiol levels are 8-42pg/mL. But wanted to ask if this a normal balance considering the dosage, or should I lower my estradiol?
I don’t think I have any side effects. I have an AI or some Masteron I could use if needed.

Estrogen is both cardio and neuroprotective. It is also anabolic. Unless your levels are causing side effects, no worries.
Looks like there was a previous thread I should have read… while his test was much higher than mine, and E a bit lower, the message seems to be clear.
I’ll keep an eye on it - I’ll also try to read more prior to asking questions that have already been addressed
 

Gadawg

The Tick
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
4,584
Reaction score
4,986
Points
193
These studies started decades ago when people were less fat. I go with the best data i have available to me whether i like it or not when making decisions. Do you have any data stating something different?
Nope. Never heard a word about estrogen being an issue (outside of blood pressure) for male health until just recently. So I wondered, if like tons of studies, if correlation may not equal causation.
 

buck

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
974
Points
83
Nope. Never heard a word about estrogen being an issue (outside of blood pressure) for male health until just recently. So I wondered, if like tons of studies, if correlation may not equal causation.
Or maybe since estrogen and males is only in recent years come up. It has not been looked into much so studies would tend to be more recent. With few available. But that does not mean it is not important. I have done searches and sound such studies. When i talked to a urologist and an endocrinologist 20 years ago both said E2 was not an issue for men and would not run tests for it. So of course, i went elsewhere. Can't say i have seen anything health wise that didn't have a range for health where to much or too little was bad.
 

Gadawg

The Tick
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
4,584
Reaction score
4,986
Points
193
Or maybe since estrogen and males is only in recent years come up. It has not been looked into much so studies would tend to be more recent. With few available. But that does not mean it is not important. I have done searches and sound such studies. When i talked to a urologist and an endocrinologist 20 years ago both said E2 was not an issue for men and would not run tests for it. So of course, i went elsewhere. Can't say i have seen anything health wise that didn't have a range for health where to much or too little was bad.
Yeah, Id love to see this delved into further.

Ive heard it supposed that women develop heart disease about ten years later than men due to the protective nature of estrogen until menopause. Would be great to understand all the protective, or damaging, nature of these hormones.

For instance, Ive always questioned the supposed safety of finasteride, which either drastically lowers, or completely terminates DHT production.

Good? Bad? I dunno.
 

buck

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
974
Points
83
Yeah, Id love to see this delved into further.

Ive heard it supposed that women develop heart disease about ten years later than men due to the protective nature of estrogen until menopause. Would be great to understand all the protective, or damaging, nature of these hormones.

For instance, Ive always questioned the supposed safety of finasteride, which either drastically lowers, or completely terminates DHT production.

Good? Bad? I dunno.
Men also traditionally have weighed more them women and that leads to higher heart problems even for women. And men drank and smoked more than women traditionally along with jobs that were less healthy along with all the other negative things men tended to do more than women. So when scientist say it is the estrogen that is the reason there are far more things involved. And just because they try to put me down their rabbit hole doesn't mean i have to go there.

Men seem to do better at the high end of the normal T scale then men at the lower end. But i do not think that means that taking women's T levels higher than normal should be healthy for them. They are built to run on E and men run on T.
I just go with the best data i have now and go from there. Others should do what is in their comfort zone.




 
Top